[PMC free content] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Carlson K

[PMC free content] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Carlson K. fit to a log-linear dose-response model. Concentration-dependent reduction of ER and apoptosis evasion was observed concurrently with the induction Sofinicline (ABT-894, A-422894) of ER, pER, and S-phase portion, and an increased rate of cell proliferation. Beyond additive effects predicted by the sum of individual test XEs, combination treatment exhibited synergism for the ER and apoptosis suppression phenotypes (> .001). Nonmalignant breast cells were more sensitive than commonly used breast malignancy lines to XE treatment in 3 of 5 endpoints. All observations were validated with cells isolated from the normal breast tissue of 14 individuals. At relatively low concentrations, a chemical combination has striking effects on normal cell function that are missed by evaluation of single components. assessments to estimate human risk for breast malignancy posed by common chemicals of commerce. First, chemicals are mostly tested individually rather than as mixtures. Such a hazard testing approach assumes that each chemical exerts its effect(s) individually, in parallel, and superimposed on those of other chemicals in the combination so that the effect at a given concentration is the same as, but no greater than, the greatest effect of the single, most active component of the combination. Since human exposure to common chemicals is usually virtually usually to a mixture, it is not possible to know if a chemical is safe until it is evaluated in its common context as one component of a mixture, and in conjunction with other chemicals to which individuals are similarly and generally uncovered. For example, a recent case-control study links the risk of human breast cancer to the total estrogenic effect of the of test chemicals in serum, rather than to individual chemicals (Pastor-Barriuso screening if appropriate test targets and endpoints were identified and employed. The second poorly addressed challenge is in employing test systems that are representative of carcinogen-targeted epithelial cells in the human breastthe cells it is hoped will become malignant. Arguably, much has been learned from studies of the effects of single XEs in breast malignancy cell lines (Lapensee they become malignant. We, as well as others have contributed to the current literature on the effects of single XEs, such as bisphenol-A (BPA), on nonmalignant human breast cells, demonstrating a mechanistic basis for the induction of resistance to cell death and activation of the cell cycle (Dairkee (2017)Serum0.673.2CDC (2015), Artacho-Cordn (2017)Adipose tissuea0.60.6Artacho-Cordn (2017)Placentaa4.011.50.46Chen (2017), Fernndez (2016), Vela-Soria (2017)2.27Fernndez (2016)Maternal blood0.810.921.8Beesoon (2011), Shekhar (2017)Cord blood1.1Beesoon (2011)Amniotic fluid5.3811.11Shekhar (2017)Human milk3.8K?rrman (2007)Concentration applied to breast cells in current study (Molar equivalents in parentheses)0.22, 2.22, 22.2 (1, 10, and 100 nM)1.52, 15.2, 152 (10, 100 nM, and 1 M)0.41, 4.14, 41.4 (1, 10, Sofinicline (ABT-894, A-422894) and 100 nM) Open in a separate window Values from human samples represent average or upper limit. aConcentrations noted as ng/g of tissue. Cell culture and XE treatment Spontaneously immortalized HRBEC lines, designated as PA024, PA025, and PA115 were previously isolated from donor-derived nonmalignant random periareolar fine needle aspirates (RPFNA) of the unaffected contralateral breast of patients undergoing surgical procedures for benign or malignant disease (Goodson (2008, 2013), Goodson (2011), and Luciani-Torres (2015). Each RPFNA cell Rabbit Polyclonal to PSMC6 suspension was divided into aliquots for cytopathology and cell culture. The cytology aliquot collected in Cytolyt, was transferred onto ThinPrep microscope slides as a 20-mm circle, stained and mounted for evaluation by a board-certified cytopathologist (I.M.J.) for the presence of cytological atypia among epithelial and stromal cell clusters. Finite-life main RPFNA cultures generated and assayed here are explained in the text in the order of sample accession from PA199 to PA222. Established breast malignancy cell lines, T47D, MDA231, and SKBR3, were expanded in RPMI + 10% Sofinicline (ABT-894, A-422894) fetal bovine serum (FBS), and MCF7 in DMEM + 10% FBS. For identity control and cell collection authentication, total DNA was amplified with 9 units of PCR primers commonly used for DNA Fingerprinting. The PCR products were run on 10% Tris-borate-EDTA-polyacrylamide gels and visualized by ethidium bromide. Each HRBEC Sofinicline (ABT-894, A-422894) cell collection was confirmed to display a unique short tandem repeat.